CVE-2026-41679 Details.
Paperclip - Remote Code Execution
Atlas does not check this one. Needs an outside server.
To test for this one, the site would have to contact a server outside your network and report back. Atlas does not run checks that need that, so it does not run this one.
About CVE-2026-41679. What It Means.
Paperclip < 2026.416.0 contains a remote code execution caused by a chain of six unauthenticated API calls in authenticated mode with default configuration, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary code remotely, exploit requires network access to the target.
Affected Product. What Is Hit.
- Vendor
- paperclipai
- Product
- Paperclipai
References. Where To Read More.
- https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/security/advisories/GHSA-68qg-g8mg-6pr7
- https://attackerkb.com/topics/86rSV7hsXi/cve-2026-41679
- https://www.rapid7.com/db/modules/exploit/linux/http/paperclipai_unauth_rce_cve_2026_41679
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41679
- https://github.com/bartfroklage/cve-2026-41679
FAQ
Common Questions.
Paperclip - Remote Code Execution. Paperclip < 2026.416.0 contains a remote code execution caused by a chain of six unauthenticated API calls in authenticated mode with default configuration, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary code remotely, exploit requires network access to the target.
No. To test for this one, the site would have to contact a server outside your network and report back. Atlas does not run checks that need that, so it does not run this one. The facts about CVE-2026-41679 are on this page, and you can request a demo to see how Brandefense watches your whole external attack surface.
CVE-2026-41679 is not on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list at the time of writing, but it is still worth fixing.
Update Paperclipai to the latest version from the vendor, or follow the vendor's advice to switch off the affected feature. Vendor links are listed on this page when they are known.
This page lists the public facts about CVE-2026-41679. Atlas does not run a check for it, so nothing here says whether a particular site is affected.